Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
So, Are We Pretty Much Done in FA?
#46
(03-13-2016, 05:54 PM)Stormborn Wrote: Wow, really? News to me. 

We didn't use a goddamn draft pick on him, we made very little initial investment. That's the point. We try to find lightning in a bottle at the position with late round and undrafted free agents and the quality of play we see reflects how many times we actually hit.

If we don't invest either in free agency or the early rounds of the draft, we aren't going to see the needed improvement, for God's sake this is embarrassingly simple yet you take a vague sentence I said and try to spin it into the nearest galaxy.

I've hit my quota with you.


Ah, I get it now.  You hate it when the Bengals do hit on a long shot like Burfict because it proves you wrong.  So you just try to imagine that he does not exist.  And that is why you said we have no good LBs despite the fact we have a First Team All Pro starter.

Have fun fantasizing about the good old days when we had first round LBs playing for us like Keith Rivers and David Pollack.  Or as I call them "the days of the 20-something ranked defenses."
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: So, Are We Pretty Much Done in FA? - fredtoast - 03-14-2016, 10:22 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)