U.S. Political Parties

[fredtoast]

(03-19-2016, 02:54 PM)6andcounting Wrote: But it's not like the next Republican president is actually going to repeal it. Mostly like there will be minor changes and claim it's a "massive overall" or "repeal and replaced" or some other strong political buzzword.

Making up something out of thin air and stating it as a fact is not a verty persuasive way to win an wrgument.

(03-19-2016, 02:54 PM)6andcounting Wrote: There are ground troops on the ground in every country we continue to bomb. They are just called advisors and aren't carrying out offense themselves missions, save for a rescue or something. Of course, the work they do is used for targeting people and places to bomb, and bombing surely is an offensive mission. Who was the last president to not bomb Iraq? It's been a while. Calling it "limited airstrikes with no boots on the ground" is how Obama has been circumventing a) having to get a declaration of war from Congress 2) admitting that bombing countries across the ME is an act of war. No one says Pearl Harbour was a limited airstrike with no boots on the ground. It was an offensive attack and an act of war. Maybe Trump or Hillary will finally pull the military from the Middle East or at least stop dropping bombs. 

So you are seriously going to stick to your position that limited air srikes and non-combat advisors is axactly the same as a full scale invasion and occupations of two countries?

Thouasnds of military troop casualties is EXCTLY the same as zero.  No difference at all.

(03-19-2016, 02:54 PM)6andcounting Wrote: He extended the Bush tax cuts his first term, and ended them in his second term. What did that really change? Nothing. 

Again their is clearly a change in the tax brackets.  You can not just make up stuff and claim it is true.
So basically you don't care about actual policy at all.  as long as the candidate was not a "coporatist neocon" you would vote for hims/her even if their proposed tax plan had a 90% bracket and wanted to bring back slavery?
How can you ignore all policy issues and just vote for a label?  You are even worse than the people who automatically vote either DEM or REP.  at least those people are making a conscious decision about actual policy positions.