U.S. Political Parties

[6andcounting]

(03-19-2016, 10:39 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Making up something out of thin air and stating it as a fact is not a verty persuasive way to win an wrgument.

Trump's plan is literally government-funded universal healthcare.

(03-19-2016, 10:39 PM)fredtoast Wrote: So you are seriously going to stick to your position that limited air srikes and non-combat advisors is axactly the same as a full scale invasion and occupations of two countries?

Thouasnds of military troop casualties is EXCTLY the same as zero.  No difference at all.

I never argued that the two things you described are the same thing, and I imagine you knew that when you typed this. I simply stated that the Middle Eastern people getting bombed don't see anything different between a Bush bomb and an Obama bomb. You responded with the no ground troops thing, which I pointed out is pathetic political doublespeak for not calling acts of war acts of war.

(03-19-2016, 10:39 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Again their is clearly a change in the tax brackets.  You can not just make up stuff and claim it is true.
So basically you don't care about actual policy at all.  as long as the candidate was not a "coporatist neocon" you would vote for hims/her even if their proposed tax plan had a 90% bracket and wanted to bring back slavery?
How can you ignore all policy issues and just vote for a label?  You are even worse than the people who automatically vote either DEM or REP.  at least those people are making a conscious decision about actual policy positions.

Is this the tax bracket thing you are talking about?

"So basically you don't care about actual policy at all." No, but I'm sure you honestly believe this because you think one party is a better choice over the other, while I'm saying they both suck equally because they're the same.. Neither party supports policies that actually embrace the non-aggression principle or individual's liberty so I don't support either party.

I said virtually every American politician for decades is a necon corporatist; however, that doesn't mean you are automatically for the NAP or liberty if you aren't one. Seizing 90% of someone's labor (which i guess makes the person only 90% a slave) or seizing all of their labor (making them 100% a slave) is hardly non-aggression or individual liberty.