'Believe none of what you hear and half of what you see'

[jfkbengals]

(03-28-2016, 02:00 PM)Devils Advocate Wrote: They wouldn't talk if they were in on it. 

In which case, they would have no need to alter it in the first place.  The person would just do it that way from the get go.

For example, a video of me is altered using this technology to have me say "Boobs are great".  But if I'm in on it, why in the hell would we use this technology instead of just having me say it in the first place, in my own voice, without any risk of a glitch or our conspiracy being discovered?