Hobson on Sirius

[wolfkaosaun]

(04-03-2016, 03:20 PM)PDub80 Wrote: Wolf started with the cherry picking stats and combining years while turning a blind eye to other stats that are more or equally important. He did that on top of throwing out ONE draft pick that was rated highly who flopped as a reason to NEVER take a highly rated prospect. Because that was the only logic presented there.

What stats am I turning a blind eye to? He ranked 18th in the NFL in rushing, but still had more yards than Murray, Lacy, and Ingram. Averaged 3.6 yards last season. Fumbled 3 times. Still doesn't erase the fact that he had over 1,900 total rushing yards and 20 TDs his first two seasons and only started 23 games. You don't give up on a guy with talent.

No, I did a comparison on the last guy that was said to be the next best RB prospect since Peterson. And then showed you that we aren't as stacked on the roster as you led to believe. And you're putting words in my mouth, so quit trying. I like Zeke, but there's no reason to take him.

Zeke doesn't make us a better contender than what we are now. We have RB depth. We don't have DT depth. We don't have CB depth. We don't have S depth. We don't have DE depth in any pass rush situation outside of Dunlap.

Zeke goes out, we have Hill and Gio.
Green goes out, we have LaFell and Tate.
Atkins goes out we have Thompson and Sims.
Dunlap or MJ goes out, we have Hunt or Clarke
Iloka or Williams goes out, we have Smith.

So if Hill goes out, we have Gio and Peerman, possibly Burkhead as well.

See the difference? Or is that too "cherry picky" for you?