Who do you take? WR

[leonardfan40]

(04-07-2016, 05:36 PM)PDub80 Wrote: Doctson's #1 on who's board?

I also like the Thomas guy a lot and could see the Bengals taking him - but the Michael Thomas I'm referring to went to Ohio State.

Corey Coleman reminds me of Steve Smith and, in my opinion, will be the best WR out of this terrible WR draft class. He is only 5'10" and the Bengals won't take a guy that short that high. They just won't regardless of talent.



What's he better in? He's taller, but not as good on ST, not as fast, not as quick, not as durable. I guess I don't get where Doctson does anything special when it comes to him vs. Coleman except be taller?

For starters Doctson can actually catch the ball which is kinda important in a WR. 50/50 balls Doctson also gets the nod. Doctson is just much more well rounded. Coleman scares the shit outta me. Good speed and it seems to be very deceptive in the short range to allow him to beat DB's quickly off the ball but his 40 time was deceptive as far as his ability to go deep, he's not as good as some might expect at that. His size brings questions about his ability to play outside, and he drops a lot of easy passes when he works the middle of the field which is a huge problem. Seems downright scared coming across the middle from what I've seen. Biggest boom/bust of the first round WR's so for that reason alone I'd prefer the other guys. 

Fuller vs Coleman if they are the only two left would make for an interesting debate, but if Doctson or Treadwell is there at 24 id take either in a heartbeat