Who do you take? WR

[PDub80]

(04-07-2016, 05:54 PM)leonardfan40 Wrote: For starters Doctson can actually catch the ball which is kinda important in a WR. 50/50 balls Doctson also gets the nod. Doctson is just much more well rounded. Coleman scares the shit outta me. Good speed and it seems to be very deceptive in the short range to allow him to beat DB's quickly off the ball but his 40 time was deceptive as far as his ability to go deep, he's not as good as some might expect at that. His size brings questions about his ability to play outside, and he drops a lot of easy passes when he works the middle of the field which is a huge problem. Seems downright scared coming across the middle from what I've seen. Biggest boom/bust of the first round WR's so for that reason alone I'd prefer the other guys. 

Fuller vs Coleman if they are the only two left would make for an interesting debate, but if Doctson or Treadwell is there at 24 id take either in a heartbeat

(04-07-2016, 06:10 PM)Stormborn Wrote: My board obviously, I don't know their board, I couldn't know.

Let me preface, I like Coleman for the two reasons I already said, but Doctson's the better and cleaner prospect. He can step in and be asked to do more things as a pure receiver. There's not really anything he does bad. Much more reliable hands, great at high pointing the ball, by far the best in his class, compared to Coleman, his route tree is a redwood. And he does a better job getting separation off the breaks of those routes. Both are pretty equal in blocking and releasing off the LOS. In the end my edge goes to Doctson.


Slightly, they are very similar but Doctson has more of a ceiling as a #1. 

I appreciate the break down, fellas!