04-13-2016, 01:29 PM
(04-13-2016, 12:43 PM)PhilHos Wrote: I was speaking of presidential candidates.
But since you asked: Benghazi, the email thing, coverup of Bill's sexual "indiscretions", Chinagate, landing under sniper fire lie, Whitewater and those are the ones I could remember off the top of my head (to be fair, I read an anti-hillary article someone posted on Facebook this morning, but whatever).
A quick Google search turned up even more. I particularly like this one:
http://www.usapoliticstoday.com/watchdog-names-clinton-most-corrupt-politician-of-2015
I admit, it is only my opinion that she's the most known-to-be-corrupt presidential candidate, but there shouldn't be any doubt that she's corrupt.
Benghazi was a mistake that was corrected in 2 weeks and benefitted no one.
The "e-mail thing" has zero to do with corruption.
"Chinagate" was a political hack job that despite extensive investigation by a Republican controlled Congress never found any evidence that the Clintons were involved. This a pattern you will see in many of the claims made about Hillary being so corrupt. The claims are usually just based on right-wing rhetoric instead of facts.
"Whitewater" see "Chinagate". Despite being granted unlimited power to investigate Kenneth starr could nevere come up with any legitimate evidence against the Clintons. Just another political hack job. the Clintons actually LOST th9ousands of dollars on ther investment in whitewater.
The sniper fire comment was stupid, but again, no proof of corruption.
Basically all of the claims about how corrupt Hillary is are equal to claims that George W Bush was involved in the planning of 9-11. They are nothing but political rhetoric without any legitimate evidence to back them up.
Just because you claim she is corrupt does not make it true.
