04-17-2016, 05:01 AM
(04-16-2016, 07:16 PM)fredtoast Wrote: He did not post a single shred of evidence against man contributing to global warming.
No, I did not. And that's the wrong argument.
I merely pointed out there's not actual statistical evidence supporting the claim man is causing global warming. It's what scientists, who have chosen to study the issue and who's livelihood's depend on the funding, believer - not what they've demonstrated with the scientific rigor they were instructed in.
This the really hard part - you don't need to provide "evidence" or proof AGAINST man-made global warming. But rather people need to provide a STATISTCAL CASE for it being so...which they have not. There's a reason the scientific method exists. If we're going to ignore it just because the hypothesis "seems" plausible....well, that's pretty much a proven loser.
Tomatoe, Tomato....is that you, Dan Quayle?
--------------------------------------------------------
