Who do you take? WR

[PDub80]

(04-23-2016, 01:35 PM)wolfkaosaun Wrote: There's a bit of a difference between that class and this one. Sanu was viewed as a top 5 WR in many cases. The top 5 WRs will most likely be gone by round 3. Possibly even before our 2nd pick. There's also a HUGE drop off in talent.

1st tier: Treadwell, Docston, and Coleman
2nd tier: Fuller, Boyd, Shepherd, Thomas
And then once you get past that it's all downhill from there.

You can't use the past to justify the present. We have a need at WR.

The talent pool is much deeper in the DT position than WR.

Also, Burkhead is not a slot receiver. It's not going to happen, there's been reports that it won't happen.

Fuller, who I think the Bengals grab in round 1, is actually considered the best WR in this years draft according to the NFL.com positional grades rankings.

Also, the past is the best indicator of the future (which becomes present). "History repeats itself" isn't just a bumper sticker.

Personally, I think COrey Fuller will be the best WR and am hoping the Bengals can look past his size and see that he would be an instant upgrade on the return teams. Lets face it, LaFell is the starting #2 WR. No rookie is coming in and displacing him any time soon.