04-28-2016, 02:01 PM
(04-28-2016, 01:53 PM)BFritz21 Wrote: He had a history of doing it, but it can't be "proven." There's no other reason of why he would make such a bogus ruling.
I don't even know what reason you are talking about. You said he had already decided to rule against you before your lawyer "rushed him".
And why did the appeals court agree with him?
