Grade the Bengals 2016 Draft
| Poll: I know we can't really evaluate a draft until 3-4 years later, but what do you think about the job our coaches and FO did in this draft? This poll is closed. |
|||
| A+ | 14 | 9.72% | |
| A | 37 | 25.69% | |
| A- | 38 | 26.39% | |
| B+ | 26 | 18.06% | |
| B | 18 | 12.50% | |
| B- | 2 | 1.39% | |
| C+ | 2 | 1.39% | |
| C | 4 | 2.78% | |
| C- | 1 | 0.69% | |
| D+ | 1 | 0.69% | |
| D | 0 | 0% | |
| D- | 0 | 0% | |
| F+ | 1 | 0.69% | |
| F | 0 | 0% | |
| F- | 0 | 0% | |
| Total | 144 vote(s) | 100% | |
| * You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
|
Grade the Bengals 2016 Draft
|
05-01-2016, 10:16 AM
(05-01-2016, 09:46 AM)Benton Wrote: You didn't see anyone in this draft that was most likely an upgrade to Margus hunt? I didn't see anyone that was most likely and upgrade to Hunt in the later rounds. I wouldn't even think about spending a pick on DE depth before CB (need), WR (need), or Andrew Billings (steal of the draft) in the 4th. Even by the 3rd round there weren't a lot of good DE's still left because it wasn't a DE deep draft. ![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png) |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
