Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
National Media Draft Grades
#19
(05-03-2016, 01:02 PM)BFritz21 Wrote: Because a good SAM, while being an improvement, wasn't a glaring need that could make as big of an impact as a dominant nose might.

He is a MLB though, not a SAM. If he becomes our future MLB than his value is greater than that of a future NT.
It's easy to see the world in black and white. Grey? I don't know what to do with grey.

[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
National Media Draft Grades - WeezyBengal - 05-02-2016, 09:47 AM
RE: National Media Draft Grades - jeremydc - 05-02-2016, 10:02 AM
RE: National Media Draft Grades - magikod - 05-03-2016, 06:18 PM
RE: National Media Draft Grades - Au165 - 05-02-2016, 10:31 AM
RE: National Media Draft Grades - McC - 05-02-2016, 02:41 PM
RE: National Media Draft Grades - Pat5775 - 05-02-2016, 03:09 PM
RE: National Media Draft Grades - Joelist - 05-02-2016, 03:23 PM
RE: National Media Draft Grades - jeremydc - 05-03-2016, 01:48 AM
RE: National Media Draft Grades - BFritz21 - 05-03-2016, 07:26 AM
RE: National Media Draft Grades - BFritz21 - 05-03-2016, 01:02 PM
RE: National Media Draft Grades - Garrus - 05-03-2016, 01:12 PM
RE: National Media Draft Grades - Benton - 05-03-2016, 03:11 PM
RE: National Media Draft Grades - Benton - 05-03-2016, 04:24 PM
RE: National Media Draft Grades - Benton - 05-03-2016, 04:56 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)