05-05-2016, 12:21 AM
(05-04-2016, 09:46 PM)BFritz21 Wrote: ...The cemetery for obvious reasons...
What obvious reasons? Seriously, most posting in this thread DON'T see obvious reasons at all. If you story is true the caretaker's responsibility is probable but how do you figure his actions make the cemetery liable? Did the cemetery tell him to do such questionable stuff? Do yo have evidence they knew that stuff was going on? All we have to go on is your side and most aren't seeing how the cemetery is liable. Keep in mind, even if it was a house owned by the cemetery and even if living there was part of his compensation for his job, it was HIS residence.
A the moment all we have to say why you think the cemetery is liable can be summed up in your own words. Twice.
(05-04-2016, 09:46 PM)BFritz21 Wrote: Then the guy who bought us the beer and whose car it was, but we let him off because his lawyers wanted to appeal the ruling I mentioned further, which we didn't want, and we could have only gotten a max of 50k out of them anyways.
and
(04-28-2016, 02:53 AM)BFritz21 Wrote: ...We say "that's fine. Let them go because the cemetery is where the money's at anyways."...
