Classless Lawyers

[BFritz21]

(05-04-2016, 10:43 PM)michaelsean Wrote: Who says the gates are supposed to be locked?Where is that law?  Do you think unlocked gates give you permission to trespass?

Not sure if it was law that it was supposed to be locked, but it was definitely the cemetery's policy and in the duties of the caretaker.

(05-05-2016, 12:21 AM)Penn Wrote: What obvious reasons?  Seriously, most posting in this thread DON'T see obvious reasons at all.  If you story is true the caretaker's responsibility is probable but how do you figure his actions make the cemetery liable?  Did the cemetery tell him to do such questionable stuff?  Do yo have evidence they knew that stuff was going on?  All we have to go on is your side and most aren't seeing how the cemetery is liable.  Keep in mind, even if it was a house owned by the cemetery and even if living there was part of his compensation for his job, it was HIS residence.

A the moment all we have to say why you think the cemetery is liable can be summed up in your own words.  Twice.


and

He was an employee of the cemetery, meaning that his actions are the cemetery's actions.  

To your point, no, it was NOT HIS RESIDENCE, it is the cemetery's house that he lives in rent-free because he is the caretaker.  

His job was to protect the cemetery, keep people out after dark, and keep the cemetery respectable and sacred, which he did not do by allowing parties back there, after dark at that (double whammy), and allowing drinking by kids 15 and under (even providing the alcohol in some cases).