05-07-2016, 03:46 PM
(05-07-2016, 03:36 PM)BFritz21 Wrote:
I have explained that he knew and even provided alcohol, which you conveniently ignore, but that's typical of you because once you claim something, you do everything to argue it, despite of how wrong you are proven. He put a refrigerator outside and filled it with beer for us before parties.
That very night, he was told that there was a girl that was so drunk that she could barely even stand or function, and then he saw her. When we wrecked, he was telling kids "to hide her."
People drank openly in their basement in winters and right outside their house in the yard, which he was outside sometimes.
As I mentioned, that night, kids went in and told him that the driver was drunk and driving, and he said "tell him not to do that," so kids were making an effort to stop us, but he wasn't, and he even admitted that he could have stopped us.
I am not asking what happened. I am asking what evidence the jury heard.
If the kids lied to protect him I am assuming he did not admit all of this to the authorities. It would not make any sense to get kids to lie for him if he was already admitting to all of this.
