05-10-2016, 02:24 PM
(05-10-2016, 10:33 AM)Brownshoe Wrote: And that article proves what? she was blackout drunk and it even says it. lol, did you even read it?
So you are back to thinking that as long as the woman claims she blacked out that is all that is necessary. But what happens if the guy says she consented (LIKE HE DID IN THIS CASE) but the victim claims she does not remember?
While you keep saying that "drunken consent is consent" the guy that got convicted here would disagree with you.
So what do you tell him?