06-26-2015, 01:18 PM
(06-26-2015, 12:41 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Who said anything like that?
All I did was compare Zampese's coaching to the coaching of others who have worked with the same QBs. Seems like a logical way to approach the issue. Especially when it is pretty clear that some QBs will throw more ints than others no matter what the coach does,
A lot of people on here and the old board do similar things.
Marvin is good because of his wins and tenure, Marvin isn't bad because of the primetime and playoff embarrassments.
Hue is good because of Hill being good, but Hue isn't bad because of the wonky playcalling throughout the year.
Zampese is good because our QBs had some good years, but Zampese isn't bad because of the bad years and stats.
Certain people have their guys that they defend a bit more extreme than others. You're just completely ignoring a reality of these boards if you claim that nobody does that sort of thing on here. Like the guy that said Marvin is good because of wins, but when we brought up bad statistics, that same guy in the same thread said "well, coaching is overrated so that stuff isn't on Marvin". Dead serious, that happened. Other people do similar things with other players/coaches all the time. Go ahead and have a conversation with me about Leon Hall, I'll probably be less objective than usual and do some stat spinning because he's been one of my favorite NFL players since the day we drafted him and I have faith in the guy even when he has a rough game or two. Meh, we all do it, just some more than others.
