Competition for AJMcCarron>?

[*Nately120*]

(05-18-2016, 03:32 PM)wolfkaosaun Wrote: Not sure why so many people are hating Mettenberger right now. With less weapons he's done more. Better arm and a gun-slinger.

But McCarron has more confidence and has better accuracy when it comes to shorter passes within 5-15 yards.

I mean, McCarron only had above 212 once in his 5 starts. Well, he technically didn't start the Steelers game, but I'll give it to him. If not he only has 212 as his highest in starts.

Mett had above 260 yards 3 times in his first 5 starts.

I know this may be an unpopular opinion, but I choose Mett over McCarron.

Sure, you can use the wins stats. But the Titans won 12 games in 3 years. They went 12-36 in 3 years. With and without Mett.

The issue with Mettenberger is, by my glance, only 2 of the 10 games played and went 0-10 in were even remotely close.  When your team is getting blown out you should be putting up some better looking stats, if nothing else.  3 times in 10 losses he threw for more than 250 yards.  Meh.  

The guy just seems like another of those big guys who goes late and doesn't do much.