Salon.com once again promoting pedos.

[Belsnickel]

(05-25-2016, 01:05 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Nope, you both have provided your interpretion of it as well as a few of the lower courts. Unfortunately there are those that may not/ do not agree with the interpretation. You haven't explained anything except "it's the law because lower courts say so".

I am stating the reasoning used, this is why every time I have explained it I have stated that is the way that the DoE has interpreted its application to Title IX, which is the executive department responsible for enforcing Title IX. I do also state that the courts, up through the circuit/appellate courts, have thus far agreed. SCOTUS won't weigh in until there is a contradictory ruling at the circuit level.

I do happen to agree with the logic, and have provided an example in an attempt to explain the thought process behind it. The attack on that has so far be "nuh uh, I disagree." That is fine, that's your opinion. I am just explaining the logic used to come to the conclusion by those responsible for enforcement and interpretation.