Salon.com once again promoting pedos.

[BmorePat87]

(05-25-2016, 01:05 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Nope, you both have provided your interpretion of it as well as a few of the lower courts. Unfortunately there are those that may not/ do not agree with the interpretation. You haven't explained anything except "it's the law because lower courts say so".

No, it was explained. You disagree with the reasoning, and that's fine, but suggesting that there was no explanation because you disagree with the reasoning of the explanation is dishonest.