Salon.com once again promoting pedos.

[*bfine32*]

(05-25-2016, 07:59 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: You mean it is unlawful to discriminate, right?

Lucie stated in another thread he wouldn't hire a transgender person.  He knows nothing about a prospective transgender employee, other than they are transgender.  In my opinion, that is discrimination based upon the individual being transgender.  Do you agree?  Explain why you do or do not agree.  If you believe it is discrimination, on what basis?

It is Federally unlawful to discriminate under a protected class. Gender is not protected by the CRA or any other federal legislature.

I may have 2 applicants apply for a job: one male that went to school at Harvard and one female that went to school at UC. I hire the male, the female brings suit and claims she was discriminated against. In fact she was discriminated against because I noted a difference in their education; however, she has no case because education is not a protected class (unfortunate for many in this forum).