06-08-2016, 01:57 PM
(06-08-2016, 12:52 PM)Beaker Wrote: A person steps over the rail at the Grand canyon to get a better picture. There are warning signs all over the rail explaining the danger. The person falls and is severly injured or killed. They should not have had the sense not to put themselves in a dangerous situation? I use that analogy because crossing the rail is going beyond a safe boundary. Similarlly, drinking to much is going beyond a safe boundary. Both are known dangerous situations to the offender. Where does common sense come into play?
If a person gets drunk and fall down because she is drunk she is responsible for her injuries.
If a person gets drunk and gets raped the rapist is responsible.
If a girl steps over a rail at the Grand Canyon and someone pushes her over the edge is the victim to blame for her fall?
