Price of Justice

[Benton]

(06-08-2016, 12:44 PM)RICHMONDBENGAL_07 Wrote: Well that's the purpose of my thread.  How could it be?  Seems there should be a more fair system.  Think about it, you make a mistake and because you don't know the details of the law  and the prosecutors do, you pay heavily.  Or because you can pay for hot shot lawyer that knows the details you can literally get away with murder.  It comes down to whether or not you have money, how is that fair?  That's not justice IMO.

(06-08-2016, 01:31 PM)RICHMONDBENGAL_07 Wrote: I'm wondering, and I'm just spit ballin here...if there could be a better way?  Both parties involved represented by the state?  Both parties represented by private parties?  Why one party would seem to have endless resources while the other does not.  I think both should be represented by the same entity, either public or private.  I just think they're could be a better way.

The problem is you're always going to have people and no two of us are the same. Even the same person won't do the same thing the same way every time. And any time you have two people, one is going to do something "better" than the other. It doesn't matter if it's hit a ball, draw a picture or argue a point.