06-14-2016, 08:36 PM
(06-14-2016, 08:29 PM)GMDino Wrote: Not for nothing but did you read what the President said?
I don't know how much more "focused" you want him to be just by using words that even you admit could potentially alienate our allies in this war.
Or who is not in the consensus that terrorism is bad because he won't use one phrase to describe it.
What exactly would the label accomplish? How you read my post and missed that part confuses me, but I'll explain again. Jeffrey Dahmer wasn't a cannibalistic serial killer, he was "a human flesh oriented depriver of homosapien life". A child molester should instead be called, "a person with sexual proclivities towards those younger than legally allowed." The fact that you don't get this distinction simply shows how significant, and pervasive, this problem has become.
