Obama: Calling ISIL 'Islamic extremists' would accomplish nothing

[GMDino]

(06-20-2016, 08:09 PM)masterpanthera_t Wrote: If a small culture within a religion allows children to marry adults, you cannot ascribe it to the whole religion.  This was addressed in my previous post (I wouldn't hold all Christians responsible for a small percentage of their population.  I also wouldn't say that the U.S. legal system in many states supports rape, because they "promote" marrying children (under the age of 18 to adults).  This is the kind of broad brush generalization that is not particularly useful.  The part of "Islam" or a radical perversion of it that is hijacked by some organizations (ISIS, Al Qaeda etc.) is being dealt with.  Nobody in the coalition against ISIS has decided to "live with their brutality", the choice has already been made to eradicate them.  None of it is going unchecked.  

Moderate Islam is not the issue.  The issue was already addressed in my previous post.  The Wahhabi ideology and its export to different parts of the world.  There are smaller groups in different parts of the world that are also violent, but, Wahhabism is the significant threat.  And since it's funding comes from Saudi Arabia, I've already discussed what Americans would have to do about this (and none of it is feasible at the moment).

(06-18-2016, 10:31 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Hows about we just roll with the old rule. Attack the message, not the messenger?

You can't use logic to respond to a message from Lucy.

Facts are just used by others to lie.  His opinions are "facts".