07-05-2016, 11:23 AM
(07-04-2016, 02:24 AM)bfine32 Wrote: So you're talking about an unmodified dragster.
Lets pretend for a minute that dragsters are not modified. The point you are trying to prove is silly. You come up with a vehicle that is not street legal and try to compare it to an unmodified weapon that is legal.
The point is valid regardless how blind you and others choose to be.
Answer me this. Which one of these 2 motorcycles should be illegal:
Ducati Panigale 1199 R
Kawasaki Ninja H2
Suzuki Hayabusa
Honda Rebel
They can all take you on a nice Sunday ride.
What is silly is comparing high powered weapons to guns in the first place. It is a false analogy used by anti-regu;ation nuts who can not address the actual issue.
Do you believe private citizens should be allowed to own air to ground missles? Because any one silly enough to believe that wei need to arm citizens to defend us from the US military is going to have to be in favor of letting anyone who wants one to own tanks and anti-aircraft weapons.
Rail dragsters are illegal because they are too dangerous. There should be no doubt that a lione has to be drawn somewhere. The question is where. and in order to properly address that question we have to talk about the danger of weapons, not cars or motorcycles. They are two totally different things. People who try to claim they are the same are just trying to avoid the real argument.
