Hillary: An Unborn Child Hours Before Delivery Has No Constitutional Rights

[BFritz21]

(07-30-2016, 11:33 AM)Benton Wrote: to the first, no, in a legal definition, it isn't a person yet. I'm not debating the right or wrong of it, I'm just pointing out the legality of it. And that's if it's not born yet, it's not a person yet.

Which is an outdated and wrong legal definition.

That's my point and how can Hillary dispute that and then, if the law is corrected, say "oh, it's a person now"?

(07-30-2016, 11:33 AM)Benton Wrote: the second part, that's the difficult part of a legal definition. No two cases are the same. One baby taken at six weeks to go might be fine, another might not make the premature birth. That makes it difficult to set a date when you confer rights ("hey, she's 22 weeks along, the fetus now qualifies for social security!"). And laws, for the most part, are about uniformity in the way things are done.

And the law is made to protect "ALL" people and beings, so you can't say it's ok to kill some babies because because some can't live on their own when some can.