Hillary: An Unborn Child Hours Before Delivery Has No Constitutional Rights

[BmorePat87]

(07-30-2016, 11:39 PM)BFritz21 Wrote: How's it not a case of common sense?

And it's not about her not knowing the law, it's about her not standing up against an unethical and morally wrong law.

Because to many Americans, it is not unethical or immoral. Only 20% of the country feels that it should be illegal under all circumstances.  The fact that we're treading into philosophical waters tells us that we're not dealing with something that is common sense. 

That and if we're just discussing the concept that your constitutional rights are yours at or by birth, how can one have these rights prior to birth? At one point do we decide someone has rights while in the womb if we are giving them out before someone has been born? It gets into a similar situation as the question of "when does life begin?"