08-04-2016, 03:26 AM
(08-04-2016, 01:59 AM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: In the case of Brown, I feel they did their job, as the DOJ, and forensic evidence, concurred.
The DOJ and the forensic evidence did not prove anything about what happened when Brown was shot. All we know is the distance between Brown and the officer at the time of the shooting.
DOJ just looked a violation of civil rights, not the justifiable nature of the shooting. there is a big legal difference.
Forensic evidence proved nothing.
All we know for sure is that the DA represented the defendant instead of the State in the grand jury proceedings. He even admitted that he put on a witness that he knew was lying, but he knew he could get away with it because there was no opposing attorney to actually question the witness. It was a compete mockery of the grand jury procedure.
