08-05-2016, 12:36 PM
(08-05-2016, 12:04 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Then why can't the man decide he wants nothing to do with the baby including providing for it financially. Aren't you giving her control over another person's life?
Oh, that's simple. We will apply your logic. The man consented to financial support when he consented to have sex. If he consented to premarital sex without putting a ring on it first he additionally consented the person with the uterus gets the tie breaker in the event the parties disagree about abortion.
