Hillary: An Unborn Child Hours Before Delivery Has No Constitutional Rights

[*bfine32*]

(08-05-2016, 01:12 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: Since you seem to believe the woman gave implied consent to every possible outcome, why don't you believe the man gave implied consent to every possible outcome?

Shouldn't you be attacking the message instead of the messenger like you tell others?

You saying that they should agree that one person gets to make the decision, my stance is that they have entered into a mutual agreement. I didn't say the woman gave consent to every possible outcome. For instance if he's a deadbeat, she gets final say. He only gets final say under the following circumstances:

She doesn't want sole custody
She doesn't want shared custody
If the parents of the mother don't want custody (they should not be able to force)
The pregnancy could jeopardize the health of the mother or baby or does so at any time during the pregnancy
He can provide for medical expenses
He can provide the baby with a safe stable environment
He has a support group (or a family care plan) to assist with rearing the child
Not if the pregnancy was a result of rape or incest (4pat)

Only if ALL those conditions are met; does the father get to keep his Child. Outside of that mom can dispose of it as she wishes.