Hillary: An Unborn Child Hours Before Delivery Has No Constitutional Rights

[*bfine32*]

(08-05-2016, 03:32 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: The only thing they agreed to was sex. That's it. 

The U.S. Supreme Court also states when the man and woman disagree "the balance weighs in her favor" because the woman actually carries the pregnancy. 


2. The responsibility is inherently unequal because the woman's body is pregnant, not the man's.


3. When does the woman have control of the man's body and can force him to do something against his wishes?

1. Not according to Fred and he's a lawyer. I think everyone is aware of what SCOTUS rule is; doesn't mean we have to agree with it; only adhere to it

2. The why must the man be forced to support a child he did not agree to?

3. She has control of his finances which directly reflects his quality of life.