Hillary: An Unborn Child Hours Before Delivery Has No Constitutional Rights

[*bfine32*]

(08-05-2016, 05:54 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: No, you can read the Supreme Court's opinion for yourself and it has been explained to you ad nauseum.


Court order child support payments are not the same as forcing you to do something with your body against your wishes by any stretch of your imagination. And you know it.


It's "petty" because I asked if child support payments were the same as someone forcing you to do something with your body against your wishes?  Or it's "petty" based upon your mental gymnastic to avoid admitting the obvious?

It is petty because you do nothing more than ask a string of questions in an attempt of "got cha" without answering questions posed to you (or as you like to look in the mirror and proclaim it's because you're a great teacher) Then when your question(s) are answered: "In both cases someone is forced to do something against their will because a pregnancy occurred as the result of sex". It becomes, not exactly the same thing.

You could most likely give me any two situations in the world and I could show you how they are not exactly the same. If you want to roll with that and "because it's the law", then you've made the point to yourself.

Good luck talking to the others in the forum and perhaps a couple will play along with your game; as this will be my last reply to you in this forum. You can be like the other guy and say "I'm scared of you because you call me out" or you can realize, even in a forum where a degree of pettiness can be tolerated; there  comes a limit.