08-07-2016, 07:46 PM
(08-07-2016, 12:02 PM)bfine32 Wrote: This has been my point. If sex is not consent to get pregnant (I thought you guys had already ironed this out BTW), then it makes 0 sense to suggest only the woman can freely separate herself from the issue if she wishes, yet the man has to abide by whatever the woman wishes. Isn't that giving her control over him?
No because she is not forcing him to do something that he has not already consented to,
If the man consents that a child can be the result of the sex then he can not claim he is being forced to do something he does not want to if a child is born.
However when he consents the child is only POSSIBLE. Sex is not a binding contract to have a baby.
Consenting to a possible outcome is not the same as having the power to force that outcome.
