08-07-2016, 07:53 PM
(08-07-2016, 07:46 PM)fredtoast Wrote: No because she is not forcing him to do something that he has not already consented to,
If the man consents that a child can be the result of the sex then he can not claim he is being forced to do something he does not want to if a child is born.
However when he consents the child is only POSSIBLE. Sex is not a binding contract to have a baby.
Consenting to a possible outcome is not the same as having the power to force that outcome.
Oh, your edit has you arguing against yourself. I'll stand by to see which side wins.