08-07-2016, 07:56 PM
(08-07-2016, 07:51 PM)bfine32 Wrote: So why isn't she required to carry his baby to term if the father wants it? She has already consented to being pregnant.
Because the man can not have power over the woman's body. He only consented to a possible outcome. Having sex is not a binding contract to produce a baby.
Are men being "sexists" when they refuse to carry a fetus in their bodies?
