08-09-2016, 09:17 AM
(08-08-2016, 10:10 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: No it doesn't. The woman has the option to terminate the pregnancy.
But what if she does not want that option? Why should she be forced to get an abortion she does not want just because she knows she can not raise the child without the assistance of the father?
There are always going to be unwanted pregnancies. The burden of those should not be placed 100% on the mother. Or even worse a woman should not bear 100% of the burden just because a guy "changes his mind"
The system you propose would allow every single man who gets a woman pregnant, even if they both planned on and wanted the pregnancy, to just back out and not be held responsible in any way. There is nothing fair about that at all. Men will stop using both control and poor struggling mother (and taxpayers) will be paying for all of their children. We can't allow men to refuse to use birth control, promise to help raise the child, and then never hold them responsible for their actions. Women will suffer terribly under those rules.
