Hillary: An Unborn Child Hours Before Delivery Has No Constitutional Rights

[*bfine32*]

(08-09-2016, 12:08 PM)fredtoast Wrote: The only way that can be fair is if technology progresses to the point that a fetus can be removed and raised outside of the woman's body.

Then would it be OK for the woman to not pay child support if she didn't want to?

(08-09-2016, 12:08 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Right now there is no problem if both want to "walk away" and there is no problem if both want to raise the child. The system works just fine on those cases.

But there is a problem if they disagree and in either case the woman's will wins out. That's not equal no matter how many times you keep saying "Is too"

(08-09-2016, 12:08 PM)fredtoast Wrote: If you allow the man to "walk away" then we will have a lot of children without the support of both parents. If you allow the woman to "walk away" you have zero children without the support of both parents. The only realistic option is to hold BOTH the man and the woman equally responsible for supporting the child. Anything else is unfair.

Now you are starting to come around to my notion that it may be justified, but it damn sure is not equal. The woman gets unequal rights because of her physical make up.