Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Assisted Reproductive Technology
#34
(08-12-2016, 03:11 PM)fredtoast Wrote: I don't see how we can put limits on a person getting pregnant "artificially" without putting those same limits on people who get pregnant "naturally".  A 60 year old man can get a woman pregnant without any assistant from a doctor.  Should we make a law against that?

And the average person is much more wealthy at age 55 than age 20.  Are we going to make laws that require young people to have a certain amount of money before they can have kids?  How about handicapped people?  Are we going to make it against the law for them to have children?

You don't think we should put age limits on certain medical proceedures?

I would definately hope physical capabilty (hadicapped) is considered when we talk about pregnancy by artifical means. If the parents are unable to care for the child I would hope it would be considered.

As far as 55 or 20 that has merit unless we consider who has the most future earning potential. BTW you are the 3rd to suggest financial restriction; I think we're getting somewhere.
[Image: bfine-guns2.png]

[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]





Messages In This Thread
Assisted Reproductive Technology - bfine32 - 08-12-2016, 01:06 PM
RE: Assisted Reproductive Technology - bfine32 - 08-12-2016, 03:17 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)