Assisted Reproductive Technology

[Mike M (the other one)]

(08-12-2016, 03:11 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Fair stance and it reminds me of the should parents be required in immunize their children or take them to the doctor when ill.

I didn't start the thread with an answer in mind; just thought I'd start something a little different.

I still hold there should be age limits when we talk about artifical methods. If a 13 year is physically capable and the parents consent (want to be young Grandparents) is your stance unchanged?

A minor? LOL one end of the spectrum to the opposite.
Minimum Age 18, but that's because of the legality involved, and the protecting of Minors who might feel pressured to do such a thing, not because they can/can't carry the baby to term.

Why do you insist on trying to make this about money? There is so many scenario's that could be in play, you will never win this argument unless you give a very very specific example.