Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Assisted Reproductive Technology
#71
(08-12-2016, 05:36 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: Call me crazy, but I think he got that impression from you. 


You stated physical disabilities should be a consideration in a conversation in which you support government limits on who can receive this type of care. 

Benton isn't tryin to portray you in a "bad light."  Nor is his reading comprehension the problem. You suggested at least some physically disabled couples shouldn't receive medical care IOT conceive a child. Period. 

This will be my last response to you in this thread because calling someone petty for correctly comprehending your statement is itself petty. 

Double rep.





Messages In This Thread
Assisted Reproductive Technology - bfine32 - 08-12-2016, 01:06 PM
RE: Assisted Reproductive Technology - fredtoast - 08-12-2016, 05:50 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)