Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Assisted Reproductive Technology
#78
(08-12-2016, 06:06 PM)bfine32 Wrote: I get that and he freely admitted he misunderstood my message. Why do you think he changes "physically capable" to "all appendages not working"? I know, he knows, and I'm pretty sure you know. 

But the make my position clear as I can see there is some honest confusion: When I say Physical capability to raise a kid should be considered when we talk about ART, I mean Physical capability to raise a kid should be considered when we talk about ART. I do not mean someone with a disability should not be able to have a child naturally or otherwise. 

But like Wildcat said: Back to the topic. 

Except when their disability affects their physical capabity to raise a kid. We understand. 

So which disabilities which affects a prospective parent's physical capability to raise a kid are disqualifying?





Messages In This Thread
Assisted Reproductive Technology - bfine32 - 08-12-2016, 01:06 PM
RE: Assisted Reproductive Technology - oncemoreuntothejimbreech - 08-12-2016, 06:13 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)