Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Assisted Reproductive Technology
#79
(08-12-2016, 06:00 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: Edit: We're being asked to get back on topic, so sorry for this response. To get back on topic, does anyone think that being handicapped should be a metric used to prevent people from having kids artificially if they are able to consent to it? I can only see legitimate concerns with those with cognitive disabilities (or to use a term we do not use anymore: mental retardation).

This is why I tried to further explain handicapped when I stated physical capability should be considered; as handicapped it a pretty broad brush. I t is also why I said parentS. I should have probably extended that to caregiver. If their is no one in the household physical capable of raising a child then that should be considered when discussing ART. Also why I mentioned limitations in the OP . 

You do bring up a good point that mental capacity should be considered. 
[Image: bfine-guns2.png]

[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]





Messages In This Thread
Assisted Reproductive Technology - bfine32 - 08-12-2016, 01:06 PM
RE: Assisted Reproductive Technology - bfine32 - 08-12-2016, 06:18 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)