Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 3 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Hillary: An Unborn Child Hours Before Delivery Has No Constitutional Rights
(08-13-2016, 04:09 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: If two people are expected to understand the consequences, then two people should be allowed to decide if they're ready/want the financial/lifestyle burden of a child. 

Your opinion.

The phrase"slippery slope" gets thrown around here a lot.  The proposal to make things "equal" by allowing any man to say he simply doesn't have to having to do with a child he helped create would be a nightmare.  Especially and specifically in a country where half the population and half the elected officials think any government help for individuals is a waste of funds.

How many men already try to not pay let alone participate in their child's life even if they were happy to have them in the first place?

Women get to decide if they want to be responsible for the gestation of a fetus in their body and all the health risks that go with during and after.  

Men don't get to make that choice for a woman and while we can say it isn't "fair" it is the reality.

Life isn't fair.  Don't want to risk getting pregnant or paying for a child for 18 years?  Don't have sex.

Every time you do you take a risk with known consequences if there is a pregnancy.
[Image: giphy.gif]
Your anger and ego will always reveal your true self.





Messages In This Thread
RE: Hillary: An Unborn Child Hours Before Delivery Has No Constitutional Rights - GMDino - 08-13-2016, 04:15 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)