Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 3 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Hillary: An Unborn Child Hours Before Delivery Has No Constitutional Rights
(08-14-2016, 02:23 AM)bfine32 Wrote: Because of biological sex. Surprised at those that are OK with this. 

Eight pages ago . . . 

(08-05-2016, 08:38 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: The courts rule the balance weighs in favor of the person physically affected by the pregnancy. They aren't being treated differently because one is male and the other female, they are being treated differently because one is physically affected and the other isn't. Their sex is secondary to that; if the man were physically pregnant the balance would weigh in his favor. Although, I'm not fooling myself into believing you will understand something so esoteric. 

In other words, one person has a medical condition and the other person doesn't. The courts ruled the balance weighs in favor of the person physically affected by that medical condition. 



But if any provide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel.


1 Timothy 5:8


Worse than an infidel!


Why do you keep questioning your god?





Messages In This Thread
RE: Hillary: An Unborn Child Hours Before Delivery Has No Constitutional Rights - oncemoreuntothejimbreech - 08-14-2016, 09:06 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)