Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 3 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Hillary: An Unborn Child Hours Before Delivery Has No Constitutional Rights
This started on page 8:

(08-03-2016, 01:46 PM)bfine32 Wrote: I once explored the "Why don't men get a say in the pregnancy?" slant is an abortion thread before.

Tell me which of these seems equatible:

A woman can choose to terminate the pregnancy, but the man cannot

A woman can abort to avoid financial reponsibility and inconvenience. A man cannot.

A woman can make the decision to keep the baby, the man cannot

The woman can choose to give the baby up for adoption without the father's consent.



I could go on.

Just two pages later:

(08-05-2016, 07:46 PM)bfine32 Wrote: As long as you admit there is sometimes need for unequal treatment based on nothing more than biological sex, then we have found common ground.  

And here we are 16 MORE pages with people saying it may not be "fair" or "equal" in most eyes it is the way it is. Some think is it "equal" based on choices either have. Some think not so much.

What more is there to discuss without all the belittling of each other?
[Image: giphy.gif]
Your anger and ego will always reveal your true self.





Messages In This Thread
RE: Hillary: An Unborn Child Hours Before Delivery Has No Constitutional Rights - GMDino - 08-15-2016, 12:41 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)