08-19-2016, 02:41 PM
(08-18-2016, 03:20 PM)bfine32 Wrote: If public policy is use facility you identify with, the the third facility would be for those that do not want to share facilities with the other sex. If public policy is use the facility that matches your biological sex; then the accomidation is for those that do not want to share facilities with the other gender. In either case a person has the legal choice of 2 facilities.
If you think having to use a third facility to make you more comfortable will not be grounds for someone to cry discrimination; then as usual, we disagree.
You are comparing apples to oranges.
In one instance a person is forbidden by law to use the facility that they want to. In the other instance everyone is free to use which ever facility they want to..
You can't cry "discrimination" when you are not forbidden to use the facility that you want to and just choose not to use it.
