08-24-2016, 10:59 AM
(08-24-2016, 07:47 AM)Belsnickel Wrote: I get the liability argument as I am the type of person that thinks in that direction. However, we aren't talking about government land. We are talking about people voluntarily going into a disaster area to help out. When there are evacuations from disasters you will often have people stay behind, you can't force them out, they have that individual liberty. As long as the government says "we do not recommend citizens be in this area and any citizen in the area does so with that understanding" you have covered your butt. Just my opinion on this.
Now..... do you remember the E.O. that Obama put through that gave the Federal Government control over all bodies of water ?
Do you think that could include flood waters covering private property ?
Just a thought.....
Sent from my SM-S820L using Tapatalk
