Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
No more AJM to Vikings talk
#23
(09-03-2016, 12:03 PM)Nately120 Wrote: I guess they figure Chase Daniels or Sam Bradford could both get injurebenched for Wentz equally well.  They're going to roll with Wentz after a month or so either way, so why have two overpaid QBs in front of him when you can do it with one?  I figure the Eagles fanbase would riot with Sam "trade me now, ok I give in" Bradford starting and then once he gets injurbenched having to sit through Chase "I'm way overpaid because the new HC is my pal" Daniels before they get to boo Wentz.

Philly fans, I tells ya!

I actually think Chase Daniels could be a surprising QB and starting against the Browns defense is a good way to get off to a good start. 
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
No more AJM to Vikings talk - pally - 09-03-2016, 11:50 AM
RE: No more AJM to Vikings talk - SHRacerX - 09-03-2016, 11:53 AM
RE: No more AJM to Vikings talk - SHRacerX - 09-03-2016, 12:36 PM
RE: No more AJM to Vikings talk - SHRacerX - 09-03-2016, 05:42 PM
RE: No more AJM to Vikings talk - SHRacerX - 09-03-2016, 05:44 PM
RE: No more AJM to Vikings talk - Goalpost - 09-03-2016, 12:24 PM
RE: No more AJM to Vikings talk - Benton - 09-03-2016, 05:49 PM
RE: No more AJM to Vikings talk - Beaker - 09-03-2016, 12:47 PM
RE: No more AJM to Vikings talk - SHRacerX - 09-04-2016, 10:22 AM
RE: No more AJM to Vikings talk - Go Cards - 09-04-2016, 01:25 AM
RE: No more AJM to Vikings talk - Go Cards - 09-04-2016, 01:30 PM
RE: No more AJM to Vikings talk - Go Cards - 09-04-2016, 01:17 AM
RE: No more AJM to Vikings talk - Jpoore - 09-04-2016, 02:39 AM
RE: No more AJM to Vikings talk - Go Cards - 09-05-2016, 01:20 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)